Thursday, September 15, 2005

Well...here i go again. As i listened to New Life Live today (i really listen to see if others struggle with the same things i do!), a man called in who has a problem with depression, and anxiousness, and he wondered if he should have these symptoms, given his circumstances. It seems that the United Church of Christ 'senate' has approved same-sex marriage. This man was in a quandry as to whether he should leave the 'church'. I guess that i agreed with the hosts answers...that if he felt he couldn't live with that decision, yes, he should leave. If he was able to accept it, then, no. I think that he will be leaving that particular 'church' soon. He was really upset. I went home and read 1 Cor.5 again. "It is reported that there is sexual immorality among you....a man has his father's wife............deliver such a one to satan for the destruction of the flesh, that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus".

Paul continues that he wrote to them not to keep company with the sexually immoral (not those OF the world, but those who are called brothers). Then...the 'biggie'....
"Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God." And yet, the 'church' not only turns away from all of the Scriptures that address this, but decides to SANCTION it!

I have always had a hard time with 'denominations' of any kind. I have thought that being a 'denomination' seems to give 'churches' the 'right' to have their own rules, regulations, by-laws, and, in effect, their own 'scripture'. Not that so-called non-denominational churches cannot have theirs, but the reason that many have left the denominations is because of these man-made scriptures.

We CANNOT call ourselves Christians if we decide to throw out the true Word of God, and insert the things that we either desire, or do not want to deal with that will offend or make waves. The UCC is not the first 'church' to go this direction. Many have already gone there. And many more will bow to pressure in the future. On the day of judgement, all the pagans in Hell will have to make room for all of the 'good church-going people'. We as pastors, priests, and ministers will be guilty of leading the hoardes down the path of destruction.

How can we read, study, memorize the entire Bible, go to seminary, become ordained, counsel people, have them put their trust in us, then lead them straight to Hell?! Yes, we are all sinners saved by the grace of Jesus Christ, but is that a reason to teach sin as proper doctrine? There is a great difference between BEING a sinner, and TEACHING it!!
"Lord Jesus, save us from ourselves, and save Your Church". mark

THE QUEST FOR HOLINESS, INSTALLMENT 4: THE STRAIN

I keep turning this matter of holiness over in my spirit, and then stumbling across passages that address the subject. Today it was Philippians 3 and John 17. Maybe they are related. And maybe I’m just tired. We’ll see.

Early in the chapter, Paul comes down hard on legalism, especially circumcision. So whatever else he says in the rest of the chapter, he is not talking about getting there by means of the Law! We worship by the Spirit, not by the flesh, because righteousness that comes by means of the law amounts to absolutely nothing.

Then Paul says that he has not already obtained “this” (knowing Christ, and attaining the resurrection from the dead), or have already been made perfect. But “I press on to take hold of that for which Christ Jesus took hold of me.” This he says he does one thing: “Forgetting what is behind and straining toward what is ahead, I press on toward the goal to win the prize for which God has called me heavenward in Christ Jesus.”

In practical terms, I ask myself, “What is the strain that Paul embraces here?” It is not to keep the law better. It could be to endure persecution and finish strong in his missional calling. But in fulfilling his calling, Paul denies himself and takes on a more heavenly mindset until at last he gets a body like Christ’s glorious body.

Jesus prayed for his disciples that they would not be of the world (the temporal, the prevailing culture), though they must not be removed from it. To be in the world, but not be of the world, that is the goal. In other words, I am called to live in this world, to be aware of my culture, and yet not be “of” that culture.

Then Jesus throws in his words about holiness (“Sanctify” and “make holy” are the same word in Greek, meaning “set apart”): “Make them holy by the truth; your word is truth. . . . I make myself holy, that they too may be truly holy.” So I am made holy by the truth, while living in the world, but not of the world, by means of the truth, which is God’s word. Got it?

In my pre-postmodern days, I knew what God’s word was. Now I only know what it isn’t.
But here’s what I am getting today from this passage: I am aware of my culture, but I am not driven by it. Rather, I am set apart, as a man on a mission, temporarily passing through. All that I see and experience is being filtered by truth as defined by God, not by this world.

So, I strain to keep a heavenly perspective on all that is around me. I am not enamored by the glitter of the world, knowing that it will all burn. But souls, both my own and those of other people, will live forever, so I strain to make use of my sojourn here on this planet to better prepare for eternity.

Friday, September 02, 2005

Ken, this is Dan. I had written something pertaining to recent events already and thought I might post it. I hope I am not out of order

All of us experience events that shape our lives and affect us deeply. Sometimes we live through significant events that make a mark on us and leave their indelible imprint. Growing up, I heard many adults recount their memories of the first moon landing. They remembered every moment in great detail, down to what they were wearing. In a similar fashion, almost everyone who lived through John F. Kennedy’s assassination can tell you exactly where they were and what they were doing when they heard the news. I used to snicker at such reminiscence until I experienced a similar day. My moment is September 11th, 2001. Even as I say it aloud, I am recalling that morning with my bride of ten days in a small apartment back in western Pennsylvania, about 40 miles from the crash of United Airlines Flight 93. I suspect that almost all of you are also going back to your respective places as well. Personally, I can still recollect the fear and anger that I felt that day with ease.

Many turned to God that day for answers. How could this happen? How could a loving God let this happen to so many innocent people? Countless Christians and non-believers alike sought advice from religious leaders. As many of you can recall, Sunday the 16th saw one of the most packed days in church history in recent years. The media also looked to the prominent figures in religion to get their perspective. As I recall, this is where Pat Robertson and Oral Roberts came under fire. They had the audacity to suggest that this was a punishment delivered by God on a corrupt nation. This was the deserved sentence for permitting abortion, pornography, homosexuality, and the like to run rampant in a land that once held God’s law as its own.

Well, this kind of rhetoric sounded almost like blasphemy. How could we deserve such a treatment? What did we do to warrant the death and destruction on such a level by the hands of such a horrendously evil group of people? There did not seem to be any logical explanation for God using MUSLIM TERRORISTS to strike against God’s “chosen people.” After all, “this land is your land, this land is my land, from the Redwood forests,…, this land was made for you and me.” At least, manifest destiny says so. All cynicism aside, how could God use such a wicked and unrighteous people to correct US? Well, the political incorrectness of these televangelists’ statements forced them to retract their original stances and take a more accepted view.

In my scrambling on that terrible morning, I admit that I searched my Bible for answers and for peace, but I never thought to look anywhere before the book of Matthew. I was used to sticking with the New Testament until I was more mature. I do not doubt the sincere intentions behind that suggestion; however, if I had looked in the Old Testament, I would have found countless examples of that day lived over and over again by a people in a far off land in a not so far off time.

Imagine having the foreknowledge of such a day! How terrible could that be? What other questions might appear? If your are the typical red-blooded American that equates patriotism with religion, then you stand with the majority of Americans who took offense to Mr. Robertson and Mr. Roberts. You might even take steps to prevent this occurrence. But what if you are one of these two Christian men? How do you respond? You see, the punishment was justified in their minds. Would you try to prevent the judgment that you yourself had asked God to bring upon a nation as a means to bring about repentance? Would you agree with God’s selection for bringing about change? I think this last question is one that we would wrestle over a great deal. We might try to bargain with God on what would be appropriate. It turns out that Habakkuk had the same dilemma that is presented here.

This prophet’s oracle begins with a petition for God to take action against his own sinful countrymen. His cry is for vengeance against those who have perverted the law and for vindication of the righteous. Sound familiar? I believe this is the cry of most preachers on Sunday mornings across this nation. There is the universal message that the world is going to Hell and something must be done. It turns out that God is about to do something very soon to influence Habakkuk’s neighbors, something very big.

This is where we arrive at the afore-mentioned dilemma. Our prophet becomes worried at the prospect of the impending judgment. God is about to send the Babylonian army against Judah to punish them for their wickedness. In their time, they were one of the most devastating forces of military might in Palestine. There was no fortification that could keep them from going over, under, or through. They had large numbers on their side in conjunction with the skills of combat. They struck terror into the hearts of anyone in their path. Now Habakkuk had that same terror interfering with his own acknowledgment of Judah’s sins.

In 1:13 we can see Habakkuk beginning to have reservations about Yahweh’s option for delivering punishment after hearing of the plan: “Why are you silent while the wicked swallow up those more righteous than themselves?” This is a familiar refrain throughout several Old Testament books. Job too believed that he did not deserve his condition because he did nothing to merit such a fate. The writer of Ecclesiastes also questions the fairness of the wicked prospering and the righteous suffering. Our prophet takes a slightly different approach and focuses on the malice of the Babylonians and the appropriateness of such a terrible force being used to inflict punishment.

I have to wonder what reprimand Habakkuk would have thought fit the sins of Judah. Perhaps a plague of locusts would have done the trick. Maybe, but that seems a little weak. What about a severe drought? No, that had already been done before to little effect. It needs to be big, but not too big. Given enough time, I am sure that Habakkuk could have come up with something that he considered effective yet still showed restraint in comparison to Yahweh’s decision.

Sometimes it seems to us like God isn’t operating on our level of understanding. We don’t see his picture of the problem and we start making judgments based on our level of information. In short, we think we know better than God, The Almighty Creator of the Universe. But, and I hope this doesn’t come as a shock to anyone, we don’t. This is the lesson that Job learns after Yahweh responds to his petitions. It’s kind of humorous to see Job rant for more than a third of the book on our same subject only to give a two-verse retort when God puts him in his place.

Habakkuk experiences a similar reply. Yahweh responds by telling him the terrific force will indeed be punished for their heinous actions. He pronounces judgment on their practices of prosperity through “evil gain,” such as extortion, violence, drunkenness, sexual sin, and idolatry. This seems to satiate the prophet’s need for clarity.

It is interesting to note that God does not answer the question our prophet put forth. Similarly, God didn’t answer Job’s query of equity either. How could this be? Could it be that the question posed is the wrong question? It seems that our level of comprehension is too small to grasp God’s design. We lack the God’s-eye-view of the situation and will always have to operate on faith. We may never understand why 9-11 happened or why a tsunami took so many, many more in a single day, or why so many are suffering in squalor after Katrina. All we are asked to do is trust God through whatever occurs. This is the premise behind Paul’s statement of hope in Romans 8:28. And as one might guess, this is the realization upon which our prophet lands. Upon hearing the Lord’s response, he offers a prayer that reflects his innermost feelings and expresses a deepened trust in God’s sovereignty: “LORD, I have heard of your fame; I stand in awe of your deeds, O LORD. Renew them in our day, in our time make them known; in wrath remember mercy” (3.2) “I heard and my heart pounded, my lips quivered at the sound; decay crept into my bones, and my legs trembled. Yet I will wait patiently for the day of calamity to come on the nation invading us. Though the fig tree does not bud and there are no grapes on the vines, though the olive crop fails and the fields produce no food, though there are no sheep in the pen and no cattle in the stalls, yet I will rejoice in the LORD, I will be joyful in God my Savior” (3.16-18).

Jesus said it just about as much with a few less words. In Luke’s 13th chapter, some approach Jesus with some “news” about some people who received horrible treatment. He responds to their insinuations by telling them that their judgment of these people’s sin is unfounded. In much the same way, he tells them that the tower that fell and killed several (sounds remarkably familiar) has nothing to do with their sin. Instead, he tells them to let it serve as a sign that they should repent.

It’s hard not to judge. We’re brought up in a western society that privileges intellect and reason. We feel that we are the best and brightest in the world. As a result, we might try to put two and two together and decide that God smote New Orleans because of sex, drinking and gambling. But we are just not equipped to handle the kind of “logic” that makes sense of what we call chaos.

Thursday, September 01, 2005

KATRINA

The worst hurricane disaster in modern American history has deluged one of our greatest cities. Mark predicted on Sunday that many people there would conclude that God is bad through this. It seems that here on Thursday night, at the very least they have concluded that rescue workers are bad, that they have been forgotten, and that their desperate need must be met immediately.

I have a tendency not to step forward when other pushy people seem to voice a stronger need than I have. That tendency is usually positive, but there have been several times when it has hurt my family, because I haven't stood up for them or been assertive when necessary. After four days in stench and heat, living with all my family gathered around, with my little ones teetering on dehydration, with dead bodies just a few feet away, waiting for a few buses to come and take 42 people at a time away, would I reach the point of desperation? What if I were a poor Black man (Ellen noticed that almost all of the images are of Blacks)? Would I add this to my long list of sleights and conclude that someone out there was getting help, but that nobody cared about me? They say we all have a breaking point. What would mine be?

So from my comfortable home, with no immediate need for gas and no shortages affecting me, what does God call me to do? We sent money electronically. I am praying some generic prayers for mercy and help. What else is there? There should be no needy people among us believers, and we are called to heal and bless the nations. Sacrifice is called for. But what would be of practical help? LORD, give me ideas and give us all ways to help from here.